madhuvj
04-22 09:23 AM
Try the thedegreepeople.com. These people can evaluate your degree/Diploma course by course specifically for Immigration purpose with in 4-5 business days and you can consult with your lawyer to appeal against the I-140 rejection. They offer you good help when you reach them thru the phone, they have one of the best Free consultation service ( And I dont work for them .. ! lol ! ). Their rates are nominal. Iam sure this is gonna help you.
Good Luck
Good Luck
wallpaper Desktop Wallpapers
letstalklc
07-09 03:44 PM
I think it supposed to come today, as of now it says - Upcoming month's visa bulletin: August 2010 (Coming Soon)
ajayabhichandani
05-24 02:56 PM
Done , send from NJ. Keep it up IV
2011 Desktop | Ecard Wallpapers
texcan
09-25 09:32 PM
Good news:
EAD production ordered -sept 24.
Details in signature
EAD production ordered -sept 24.
Details in signature
more...
anurakt
09-25 02:21 PM
My DL was renewed for four years, much beyond my I-94 expiry, both the times...so guys, come on to CA...Golden land of jobs, good weather, cosmopolitan and accomdating/tolerant ppl of all races/religions :-). I am still on H1-B though..
Rambha,
See the above reply. I assume if they allow -I-94 , then EAD should be treated the same way.
Rambha,
See the above reply. I assume if they allow -I-94 , then EAD should be treated the same way.
h1techSlave
04-09 09:28 PM
How much does a typical lawyer charges for responding to the Employment verification RFE?
more...
grupak
07-10 04:47 PM
NIW is tricky. As you have PhD, you can apply yourself (w/o sponser) in EB1 Researcher catagory, if you do that kind of job.
The only self-sponsoring category are: EB2-NIW and EB1-EA (Extra Ordinary). EB1-EA is harder but EB2-NIW is not easy either. NIW will have to argue why labor certification should be waived. Talk to a lawyer. You will have to show YOUR work not just the field you work in has merit and in national interest. And you bring unique abilities to the US. Your past achievements and not future potential counts more.
The only self-sponsoring category are: EB2-NIW and EB1-EA (Extra Ordinary). EB1-EA is harder but EB2-NIW is not easy either. NIW will have to argue why labor certification should be waived. Talk to a lawyer. You will have to show YOUR work not just the field you work in has merit and in national interest. And you bring unique abilities to the US. Your past achievements and not future potential counts more.
2010 your desktop background.
LostInGCProcess
10-01 05:00 PM
I came back via Frankfurt last month. AP no prob. But be aware of Lufthansa. It was worst trip of my life. Bugger airline had cancelled flight from FRA to Mumbai without notifying. They gave me two options after I landed at FRA. 1. Wait at airport for 27 HOURS for next days flight (as they don't give Indians visa @ airport for hotel stay) or 2. Wait for another 6 hours at airport, then take flight from FRA to zurich, wait at zurich for 3 hrs, then zurich to Dubai, wait at dubai for 3 hrs and then dubai to Mumbai. Unwillingly I had to accept 2nd option.
Staff is damn rude, had to wait in long line for 3 hours to talk to cust service.
Never in my life will I travel with Lufthansa :mad: :mad: :mad:
That's terrible and it could happen to anybody and I can imagine how helpless we feel at that time. I have utter contempt for those airlines. Please send emails to as many as possible to the airline and highlight your plight. Whether they hear it or not, they should know at least how you were mistreated.
Staff is damn rude, had to wait in long line for 3 hours to talk to cust service.
Never in my life will I travel with Lufthansa :mad: :mad: :mad:
That's terrible and it could happen to anybody and I can imagine how helpless we feel at that time. I have utter contempt for those airlines. Please send emails to as many as possible to the airline and highlight your plight. Whether they hear it or not, they should know at least how you were mistreated.
more...
Libra
07-12 12:51 PM
My question is a person with no shame, can he feel shameful???:confused:
hair Desktop | Ecard Wallpapers
GCAmigo
01-24 12:51 PM
contributions have to be voluntary.. finger pointing would be of no good & on the contrary will be counter-productive..
more...
voldemar
03-01 12:41 PM
Labor RIR Case from MN (Approved Recently)
Labor RIR Case from TX (Approved Recently)
Labor PERM EB3 (Approved in 2006)
Paid so far 8K (including USCIS Fees)
Lawyer is asking more now for
Filing I-140 - I-485 - EAD - AP (for both me and my wife)
Have I paid too much? Should I pay more to him?
Your lawyer is cheap. I paid 7500 for 1 labor certification.
Question for you. What USCIS fees did you pay. I don't recall any USCIS fee on labor stage.
Labor RIR Case from TX (Approved Recently)
Labor PERM EB3 (Approved in 2006)
Paid so far 8K (including USCIS Fees)
Lawyer is asking more now for
Filing I-140 - I-485 - EAD - AP (for both me and my wife)
Have I paid too much? Should I pay more to him?
Your lawyer is cheap. I paid 7500 for 1 labor certification.
Question for you. What USCIS fees did you pay. I don't recall any USCIS fee on labor stage.
hot Lamborghini Cars HD Wallpapers
gcnirvana
02-05 12:16 PM
I have two 797s: one which is current valid till June 2007 and the other from July '07 till July '10 (using my approved I140). I am going for visa stamping this March at Chennai consulate. Can they combine both my 797s and stamp me till 2010 or they'll do it only till June 2007?
more...
house has wallpapers lamborghini
letstalklc
07-12 03:28 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 598 (71 members and 527 guests)
Every one eagerly waiting for this month's visa bulletin, that's why, but no (598) seems to be high.
Every one eagerly waiting for this month's visa bulletin, that's why, but no (598) seems to be high.
tattoo Lamborghini, prototype desktop
pani_6
11-28 03:56 PM
I am not sure when the CIR will pass...its not on Nancy Pelosi aganda in forseeable future... and several people already mentioned that if it didnt pass by MAY07 then you are looking at Jan 09 to get immigration stuff to happen...
I think we need to work on an interm EB relief bill ...which is absolutely non contraversial and try to pass it....not worring about piggy backing the CIR...
Issues such as h1 increase or adding more numbers need not be in it...we can include things like EAD after I-140...spouse/childer not considered for EB quota...etc...
Unless we act desissively now...its going to be a long way to 2009..
I think we need to work on an interm EB relief bill ...which is absolutely non contraversial and try to pass it....not worring about piggy backing the CIR...
Issues such as h1 increase or adding more numbers need not be in it...we can include things like EAD after I-140...spouse/childer not considered for EB quota...etc...
Unless we act desissively now...its going to be a long way to 2009..
more...
pictures tattoo hd desktop wallpapers
HV000
04-02 07:58 PM
USCIS - FBI Joint Plan to Eliminate Name Check Backlogs
May 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 3 years
July 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 2 years
Nov 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 1 year
Feb 2009 - Process all name checks pending for more than 180 days
Jun 2009 - Process 98% of all name checks within 30 days and process the remaining 2% within 90 days
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/NameCheck_2Apr08.pdf
May 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 3 years
July 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 2 years
Nov 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 1 year
Feb 2009 - Process all name checks pending for more than 180 days
Jun 2009 - Process 98% of all name checks within 30 days and process the remaining 2% within 90 days
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/NameCheck_2Apr08.pdf
dresses pad desktop backgrounds
nogc_noproblem
07-16 12:20 AM
Correction: July 17th 2007 & July 28th 2007 - Please correct it.
Could not understand what you mean by 'these 485s are still unadjudicated'. Of-course yes, that's why the dates are moved further so that they can get adjudicated.
Again 'Once they get adjudicated there would be retrogression' what do you mean? If they all get adjudicated then what is the reason of retrogression again? Am I missing something here? May be we can take it like this, depending upon the volume of the approvals, the dates will go back, higher the approvals, lesser the retrogression.
I do not want to spoil the party fun but somewhere in my mind there is a lingering doubt. I read Ron Gotcher's post about August 2008 bulletin.
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?p=20233#post20233
He says that Eb2 India will retrogress to 2003 or 2004.
This is my opinion. TSC 485 processing time is July 17,2008. NSC 485 processing cut off date is July 28th, 2008. I don't know if CSC is still processing 485 EB applications but CSC EB processing cut off date on its website is April 04, 2006. The priority date for June 2007 bulletin was April 1st2004.
Lot of big law firms filed 485's around August 1st because the date for filing 485's was extended to August 17th. So I think these 485's are still unadjudicated. Once they get adjudicated there would be retrogression. Analysts analyze. However the silver lining would be removal of concurrent processing of I-140 and I-485 which may give some additional EB 2 numbers next year.
Could not understand what you mean by 'these 485s are still unadjudicated'. Of-course yes, that's why the dates are moved further so that they can get adjudicated.
Again 'Once they get adjudicated there would be retrogression' what do you mean? If they all get adjudicated then what is the reason of retrogression again? Am I missing something here? May be we can take it like this, depending upon the volume of the approvals, the dates will go back, higher the approvals, lesser the retrogression.
I do not want to spoil the party fun but somewhere in my mind there is a lingering doubt. I read Ron Gotcher's post about August 2008 bulletin.
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?p=20233#post20233
He says that Eb2 India will retrogress to 2003 or 2004.
This is my opinion. TSC 485 processing time is July 17,2008. NSC 485 processing cut off date is July 28th, 2008. I don't know if CSC is still processing 485 EB applications but CSC EB processing cut off date on its website is April 04, 2006. The priority date for June 2007 bulletin was April 1st2004.
Lot of big law firms filed 485's around August 1st because the date for filing 485's was extended to August 17th. So I think these 485's are still unadjudicated. Once they get adjudicated there would be retrogression. Analysts analyze. However the silver lining would be removal of concurrent processing of I-140 and I-485 which may give some additional EB 2 numbers next year.
more...
makeup Lamborghini Diablo GTR Desktop Background
pitha
08-14 01:58 PM
I like your optimistic attitude but unfortunately I don�t share it because of past and current behavior of USCIS, like for instance how they willfully disregarded the 180 day name check memo. Do you really believe them when they say name check will be cleared in 2009, just like the current name check memo the fbi name check clearance will be thrown in a dustbin. If by a miracle name check is solved they will come up with some other check delay for example IBIS name check delay. the bottom line is if there is a will there will be a way, USCIS has no will what so ever to help us. Good luck to everyone but just build a reservoir of patience because if you have hope on USCIS you will pay dearly.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
girlfriend Lamborghini Classic Miura Desktop Background
shankar_thanu
06-14 07:17 PM
You guys are right, we have to keep track of this CIR monster, should not get distracted by the dates becoming current. It can retrogress anytime...
hairstyles Lamborghini Wallpapers - Page
nmdial
03-01 12:10 PM
Can you please help me with this?...I have already submitted the affidavit copy and now they want it from Registrar office. Has any one got it from registrar office in India? if so, how difficult it is and what is the procedure?
"A photocopy of a birth certificate issued by the Local Registrar if the person named above was born in a city, or
A photocopy of a birth certificate issued by the Additional District Registrar’s office if the person named above was born in a village.
If a birth certificate does not list the names of both mother and father, or the child, secondary evidence must be submitted to establish parentage. Secondary evidence includes, but is not limited to , copies of: medical records, school records, census records, government-issues identity cards, religious records and/or affidavits from at least TWO persons alive at the time of birth. The oldest available evidence that lists the names of both parents should be submitted."
Thank you!
Ask your parents (anyone of them) to visit the registrar at the municipal office of your home town. The registrar will issue the birth certificate once your parents submit an affidavit to the office. Hope this helps.
"A photocopy of a birth certificate issued by the Local Registrar if the person named above was born in a city, or
A photocopy of a birth certificate issued by the Additional District Registrar’s office if the person named above was born in a village.
If a birth certificate does not list the names of both mother and father, or the child, secondary evidence must be submitted to establish parentage. Secondary evidence includes, but is not limited to , copies of: medical records, school records, census records, government-issues identity cards, religious records and/or affidavits from at least TWO persons alive at the time of birth. The oldest available evidence that lists the names of both parents should be submitted."
Thank you!
Ask your parents (anyone of them) to visit the registrar at the municipal office of your home town. The registrar will issue the birth certificate once your parents submit an affidavit to the office. Hope this helps.
natrajs
08-23 07:25 PM
All the 485 Applicants Should get a FP Notice except for the Minors, In some instance Minors too get it
lord_labaku
01-11 12:15 AM
I have been there. done that. As soon as ported labor applicant using AC21 moves on & finally gets his GC, his labor cannot be ported anymore; even though you filed to use his labor before he obtained his/her GC.
Mind you, I used labor substitute not from a shady consulting company but from a reputed nasdaq listed company & had top lawyers appealing and proving my case. No use.
I think AC21 & labor substitution fundamentally had these issues where they could not co-exist. Since labor substitution was prone to abuse anyway. It was done away with. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say. Just I had to spend 3 years in limbo. What can I say - only solace is that there are others who are worse of than me.
Move on. Theres no point appealing this denial of I140.
Mind you, I used labor substitute not from a shady consulting company but from a reputed nasdaq listed company & had top lawyers appealing and proving my case. No use.
I think AC21 & labor substitution fundamentally had these issues where they could not co-exist. Since labor substitution was prone to abuse anyway. It was done away with. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say. Just I had to spend 3 years in limbo. What can I say - only solace is that there are others who are worse of than me.
Move on. Theres no point appealing this denial of I140.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar